Still, Paul Dacre manages the odd editorial in support of Brown in the Mail, which, like most papers, has suffered a 9% downturn recently. And the Telegraph, to the fury of its readers, also lends a clothes-prop to the waxed dummy from time to time.
Kinnock is said still to feel deeply hurt at having his head in the Sun's lightbulb on the eve of that disastrous election. Their treatment of Brown today is a little kinder - but he'll still feel it like a kick in the gonads.
5 comments:
Yes, the Telegraph has lost it too. Its useless series on the EU; the odious Mary Riddell; its toadying specifically to Cameron (except for Simon Heffer); its swallowing of the AGW hoax; all of these counterbalanced only by the excellent MPs troughing exposures.
So who's left supporting ZaNu? The BBC, the Grauniad, the Mirror obviously; who else? And why even them, after Brown has wrecked our economy?
He should try at get Sky onside. Sign up for the leader's debate IF they promise balanced , i.e. Labour favourable, coverage up until the election.
It would be worth it for SKY to say yes and for Gordon too, if he can pull off a media deal.
As for the fact that Gordon would be hopeless at a live debate so what? Its hardly going to make much difference now. Its all about keeping hold of 24% who think he's doing a good job.
He should try at get Sky onside.
Not likely, considering Murdoch's interests in both 'Sky' and 'The Sun'...
Murdoch would do a deal on Sky News reporting 'bbc' style on politics.
Sky cashes in on the leaders debate. That's a big prize, and impartial news reporting on tv is the law.
The Sun can still do what it likes.
Has to be worth a go for Brown- or Brown goes.
Took The Sun long enough to work out the obvious. Nill Points.
Post a Comment