Saturday, 18 January 2014

Women in their 60s shun magical sex memories

Apologies for the headline, but you'd need a heart of stone not to chuckle at Paul Daniels' complaint in the Mail this morning that no women in their 60s have come forward complaining of having been sexually molested by him in the 1960s and 70s. "I had sex with hundreds of girls and had no idea of their age" said the midget magician "it was all a big blur".

Despite which not one has come forward to complain. Perhaps there are some things still too shameful to admit ...

8 comments:

meltemian said...

No why was my first reaction hysterical laughter I wonder??

Mr Ecks said...


He is lucky to not been selected as a victim by the femmi-commisars and the liars and bullshitters helping them with their dirty work.

Mac the Knife said...

They liked it, but not a lot?

I'm sorry. I'm so very, very sorry...

Bill Quango MP said...

I am still unsure exactly what DLT's crime is. So far he has inappropriately touched a number of ladies. he's certainly creepy. But why is he in court?

Or rather why is he in court and Lord Rennard not? The offences and the complaints sem remarkably similar. Men behaving inappropriately and because they are 'powerful' not getting the slap they deserve.

Anonymous said...

"Men behaving inappropriately"

Bleuh!

This is getting really tedious.

Men and women are sexual creatures, there isn't any aspect of human existance where sex doesn't play a role.

Trying to deny that is insane. Not surprising the feminazi are.

Sceptical Steve said...

Bill Quango, DLT's "crime" is to have lived until 2014. His sort of creepy, exploitative behaviour (by both the men and women involved) seems to have been de rigueur in the entertainment industries in the 60s and 70s. (It's as if the courts never heard of groupies"?)
It's deeply frustrating that the truly nasty bastard, James Saville OBE, managed to suppress all the allegations in his own lifetime, but his death seems to have released such a tidal wave of revisionism.
(Rennard, however, does seem to have serious form for demanding sex for advancement within the LibDems, which would take his activities to a much more serious level of criminality.)

Anonymous said...

Unless someone has photographic or otherwise corroborating evidence it's one persons word against another's.
Here in Scotland they're trying to abolish 'corroborating evidence' as a requirement for prosecution - leaving us ALL open to a 'he said, she said' trial....

Weekend Yachtsman said...

"...leaving us ALL open to a 'he said, she said' trial..."

Indeed.

And guess which of those will be believed, and which will have anonymity even if malicious and false, and which will have their name all over the papers even if innocent...