Tuesday, 17 June 2014

'British' Jihadis - We Know Who You Are

If there is one small light from the horrors of the latest chapter of the Islamic civil war being played out in Iraq, it is that we now know the identities of all the volunteers from the UK who have joined ISIS, some 400 terrorists.

As the Guardian reports, a CIA-led kill mission against Abdulrahman al-Bilawi, the head of ISIS' military council  in Mosul, undertaken shortly before the city was taken, captured memory sticks with extensive records of the organisation's finances, personnel, resources and organisation - including the identities of all foreign fighters. The data would then have have been swiftly transmitted to Langley, and then to our own security services on Millbank and Vauxhall. Added to the mass of our existing intel on the identities of UK Jihadis, and Sunni moslems missing from the dole queue or from their jobs, it must mean we now know the identity of every one of the 400 odd 'Britains' who have joined the ISIS butchers. 

The question is, what are we going to do about it. Or rather, will the Home Secretary have the balls to put the safety of British citizens above the 'human rights' of the terrorists and exclude them from re-entering the UK? Let them stay in their new Sunni state - they deserve it.   


Sackerson said...

What happened to Brits who joined the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War?

Raedwald said...

I think there's a huge difference between them; the IB were fighting fascism and totalitarianism, and many returned utterly disillusioned with Communism once they had experienced Soviet brutality at first hand. They were largely fighting in defence of British values - fairness, democratic legitimacy and so on.

The Jihadists on the other hand are fighting against all things western and British - they hate us.

But yes, there are some points of similarity and I've noted the dilemma previously.

Anonymous said...

An excellent idea Raedwald banning them from coming back here.
Perhaps their immediate families might like to re-join them as well?

But until this Islamic cancer is removed from this country I fear for my grand children's futures.

Curmudgeon said...

I guess the answer will be "no", then.

Wildgoose said...

We all know that our politicians care nothing for our borders and way of life - and I suppose this is just the test that will prove that point beyond doubt.

DeeDee99 said...

Not a hope. Their "human rights" will be top priority.

I'd like to see them tried for war crimes.

Ed P said...

This Home Secretary, despite being female, has more balls than the previous few hopeless placemen. So there's some small hope these vile and aggressive people could be refused re-entry.

G. Tingey said...

Re-institute Regulation 18B?

Try them for treason?

If they have dual; citizenship, then re-entry can be refused quite easily, otherwise we have a problem.

Sackerson is totally wrong & Radders correct.
Think of Laurie Lee, for instance, or Geo Orwell, neither of whom had any time for the communist religion.

Anon 2 said...

In any case, they're not British. So why should they expect to be treated as Britons when they are incapable of either being, or behaving, as such?

James Higham said...

Or rather, will the Home Secretary have the balls to put the safety of British citizens above the 'human rights' of the terrorists

Answers itself I think.

Anonymous said...

All you need to know is politicians are cowards: they'll do just enough to pacify the public whilst at the same time avoiding any backlash from the massive demographic they imported.

They won't tell you this but we're at war with Islam 24/7 in the UK. Ask Paul Weston what the police told him. The Muhammadans are playing the long game - taking Europe, all of it, via the uterus.

Keep watching. You'll see appeasement at every level till its too late, at which point it'll be "convert or die". We've got less than 20 years to sort it out. If we don't, we'll be history and your granddaughters will be wearing Burkhas.


Sackerson said...

I accept that I may be wrong, though Raedwald has given my question courteous and considered response. But although Orwell came back from Spain a confirmed anti-communist, he did not go there so.

As for Laurie Lee, I don't know enough to say, but it's a truism to say the young are liable to idealistic rushes of blood to the head. Assisting this are not only their hard-hearted mentors but what some Western nations have done in the region, from covert destabilisation to outright and illegal attack and invasion - in the service of what? Halliburton's profits? Greater security of oil supply (ha!)

Cet animal est très méchant: Quand on l'attaque, il se défend.

I grant that there are those who hate us merely for being "unbelievers", but we have certainly multiplied their motives.

Anonymous said...

Of course they will let them back in. It's their human rights, innit ?

Sebastian Weetabix said...

The fundamental difference is the people who joined the international brigades in Spain were British. I venture to suggest those in Syria are not, neither by lineage nor culture, despite their possession of British passports. For our own safety we should make them stateless and leave the silly bastards where they are.

As Daniel O'Connell said of the Duke of Wellington, "no, he is not an Irishman; he was born in Ireland, but being born in a stable does not make a man a horse"

I appreciate this is not a widely held view among our brainwashed chatterati.

Raedwald said...

I think I share substantial common ground with Sackerson in that we cannot claim to have clean hands in this. We mouth the platitudes about freedom, justice, equity and the rights of self-determination with the caveat that the Islamic world isn't yet ready for them; we fail to acknowledge our most grievous foreign policy errors and fail to call those responsible (yes, you, Mr Blair) to justice. Yes, the injustice and hypocrisy must be palpable to many young Muslims in the UK - young men who might otherwise be inclined to be more 'British'.

However, we cannot expose the innocent public to dangers just to protect the immoral corporates and the political class. So the returning Jihadists must be refused entry, or jailed or restricted under harsh surveillance.

At the same time, we must put Blair and his associates on trial - to prove to our own young Moslem men that our words are not just hollow hypocrisy.

Ian Hills said...

I wish someone would publish these buggers' names on the Internet.

Cascadian said...

"I wish someone would publish these buggers' names on the Internet" Simple......Mohammed (or a variant of same).
The very same name being the most popular boys name in Britain, which should tell you where you are headed.
When members of the armed services are murdered and beheaded on your streets in broad daylight, it is beyond time to worry about a purported 400 jihadists.
Stopping the re-entry of 400 is but the tip of a very large iceberg that your politicians will NOT deal with.

Anonymous said...

Raedwald said @ 21:22

'..to prove to our own young Moslem men that our words are not just hollow hypocrisy'

Spoken like a true politician Raedwald - except you're not into politics these days (see above right disclaimer). They may be your 'young Moslem men' but they're certainly not mine, nor will they ever be


G. Tingey said...

You fucking idiots!
Don't you realise that "islam" sa as varied as christianity.
Everyone is a loone, but some are completely harmleiss (Quakers, Sufi, Ahmadihya) & some are murderous shits of the first water (Covenanters, Dominicans, Salafist etc ...) and that these distinctions matter?

However, agree 150% about putting Tony B Liar on trial .....