Cookie Notice

However, this blog is a US service and this site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and analyze traffic. Your IP address and user-agent are shared with Google along with performance and security metrics to ensure quality of service, generate usage statistics, and to detect and address abuse.

Monday, 29 February 2016

Bloody Blair, spook Dearlove indicted by Bower in Mail

The Mail hits the week running, with a major destruction of Bloody Blair by running substantial chunks of Tom Bower's new book. And after a supposed 200 interviews - surely as many as Chilcot? - it's clear that Bower indicts Blair himself and the spook Dearlove. The triumverate of senior officers of State at the time of Blair's unlawful war - Hoon, Straw and Irvine - get off very lightly in this serialisation. Bower asserts they were all kept outside Blair's plans during the phase in which he committed the UK to war;
"Blair’s position was now unprecedented. No other British Prime Minister had ever planned to start a war while distrusting his Chief of Defence, the Cabinet Secretary, the Foreign Secretary, the Defence Secretary and most of his Cabinet."
It looks as if his former chums have been distancing themselves from Blair, possibly in anticipation of his prosecution following the publication of the Chilcot report. And for Chilcot himself, the need now to check his own findings against the evidence that Bower produces - including proof that Blair lied to his enquiry. The inclusion of the spook Dearlove, who left full-time intelligence in 2004 for a spell recruiting nice Cambridge boys for the service until 2015, must be a disappointment for a man who must now be expecting a life peerage but who may end up in the dock alongside Blair instead.

These are something of Schrödinger's cat times. Both Blair's prosecution and leaving the EU are live possibilities - you note I don't write probablilities - until those boxes are opened. Alas, I think there is only one certainty - that Chilcot has already earned more from his efforts on bringing closure to Blair's folly than Tom Bower will ever earn from his book. 

Housekeeping - S-R, you're rationed to one relevant and succinct comment, please.


Barnacle Bill said...

I will never, ever forgive T BLair for what he did to my country. The one in which my grand children will have to live with the consequences of his intentional destruction of the values of this once fair land. Whilst he swans around the world, his protection paid for by us, adding to his stash of blood money.

To see him in the dock at the Hague would be poor recompense.

Lock me in the same room as him, I would try to ensure his departure would be as bloody and painful as I could make it, even if I only had my bare hands.

A plague on the House of BLair!!!

Anonymous said...

I suppose the question is...

Are we going to have to wait as long for the Chilcot report for as long as we have waited for the referendum?

And when it comes, will the establishment do the best it can to rubbish or corrupt the result, as I fully expect to happen with the upcoming ballot?

DeeDee99 said...

No Prime Minister has emerged from that Office, so discredited as Blair. I cannot think of a single positive, lasting benefit his Government contributed to this nation.

I hope and pray he's prosecuted; but regardless of the evidence, I think The Establishment will close ranks to protect him. It would be too dangerous for them to prosecute him.

Malcolm Stevas said...

I might be able to hold my nose and read a book about Blair, principally for the material concerning his alleged approval for opening the floodgates and permitting the entry of hugely swollen numbers of alien non-European immigrants - a demographic disaster for which I would like dearly to see retribution visited on the heads of those responsible, with terminal effect. I never understood why this matter has not been investigated in depth by all those intrepid dirt-digging journos, the Brit equivalents of the Watergate investigators. It would be paranoid to imagine not enough of them are keen to see senior "New Labour" figures in the dock of public opinion....

Sebastian Weetabix said...

Of course it is good fun to have the useless Blair as the sin-eater, but what about all the spineless fuckers that went along with it? There were no resignations from the defence staff. The alleged Tory opposition, led by that idiot Duncan Smith, was even more warmongering than Blair. I recall being absolutely astonished when they all swallowed the 45-our-brave-lads-in-Cyprus-under-threat guff, and it didn't need hindsight or millions spent on an enquiry to know it was a steaming great pile of ordure. Anyone with eyes to see could tell it was bullshit and that Blair was dead set on war due to some mental messianic complex.

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure I could stomach a read of this book. I agree with others here, Bliar and his colleagues ruined this country. It will probably never recover and I wish him nothing but ill. I certainly could not put up with his grinning mug in my house, if that is on the cover, though I am interested in the damning contents.

Bliar massively sucked up to Bush, he was paving the way for a future fortune and did not care a fig to the thousands who he got killed in the Iraq conflict or the damage to this country. Traitor is too good a word to be applied to him.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

If The Right Honourable Tony Blair was such a bad man, traitor and general country-wrecker, why were he and his party re-elected to a majority government, albeit reduced, in 2005 after his inception of the Unlawful War in Iraq?

The Daily Mail? I love anything that comes from The Daily Mail and the Rothermere Family. I particularly love the first two sentences/paragraphs in that front page editorial of The Daily Mail from September 15, 1940, I think.

Sebastian Weetabix said...

That is from 1934, not 1940.

Elby the Beserk said...

Mr. Rhetoric, whilst the Daily Mail may have supported Hitler before the war, why is it never mentioned that the Left, collectively, refused to acknowledged that Stalin was a monster until years after WWII? Indeed, that utter *unt Hobsbawm went to his grave refusing to condemn him - he was just sad that Stalin's reforms didn't work out. Two sides to a coin, eh?

Also - you ignore the fact that the Tories were still unelectable in 2005. Again, two sides to that coin as well. Eh?

Anonymous said...

George W Bush, president of the USA at the time told Bliar though British troops would be welcomed on this Iraq adventure he was going ahead, with or, without UK assistance.

Bliar thus, had a get out clause, though enabling acts of gross stupidity was always his calling.

Further, notwithstanding Campbells fantasy WMD's dodgy dossier and all of the fuqwits who backed in Westminster - an awful lot of idiot hawks in the military were telling Field Marshal Bliar - "yes we can!" And think, at the back of all these, there must have lots and lots of military hardware manufacturers - goading Bliar and rubbing their hands with glee.
The vaulting vanity of Bliar was matched, by the ocean going and utter incompetence he displayed in running the country (down).

A Internationalist, Bliar who listened intently to those whispering Cultural Marxist poisons, the wormtongues in the scum hoovering EU Corporate gremlins-Goldman Sachs/ Washington elite. Plus Bliar's ever obsequious fawning before the NYC-UN and with it's guidance from the George Soros-Bilderbergers self appointed world controllers and not least pushed, thumped and beaten by his perpetually gold digging vampire 'Lady Macbeth' - as indoors adviser and muse and accomplice: whose hands are also covered in blood.

Under his nu scum administration, the ruination already commenced under Major and through Maastricht took on a life of its own, the decision to open the gates was all the Nu scum party - though Dave continues with it.

I curse Bliar, his name will be and forever associated with betrayal, his personal perfidy and the iniquity of the Iraq and Afghanistan regime change efforts.
In its aftermath, what he has sown therein, unleashed a nightmare of murderous insanity, a blood maddened dervish which will come here to the UK and it will cause civil chaos with carnage - Bliar. His little sordid adventure in Iraq and Afghanistan set it all in train, witness the Greek islands which is now on the Asian highway going back as far as Xinjian, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Burma and beyond that.

Arraign him, put Bliar - this bug eyed gimp and evil little dolt before the court of justice in this land - not over there in the Hague.


Camoron, opened the gates to deepest darkest Africa - musing on dark thoughts. One could quite easily arrive at the conclusion; Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya all major transnational crossroads...destabilizing these regions: was it all deliberately done?

Raedwald said...

Please - either I let S-R respond to your points, or we leave their points as they stand. For what it's worth, I think both the points they make are fair and apposite (except the date).

mikebravo said...

The ignorant and stupid voters elected that man (via labour) 3 times. They probably would have done a 4th time.
Last year an overwhelming majority were said to be in favour of invading Syria - "to do good". Go figure.
Anybody who could not see through that rictus grin right from the start are too stupid to be allowed to vote (just noticed that i had inadvertently typed breed instead of vote!).

His poison still lingers because Chilcot is being allowed to bury the obvious, and now well known evidence. There are far more people than just Blair who would be hung out to dry.

The boil needs to be lanced and the British voters need to know what is going on behind closed doors in their name. Perhaps then they will wake up and start to ask questions again (or perhaps not).

Demetrius said...

To be balanced, fair and even handed, I only want him to swing at Tyburn.

Anonymous said...

You've had my opinion of Blair several times Raedwald. It was 'Third Way' politics: the immigrants were the change agents (pluralism) and the wars were decapititions (new order).

Blair, et al. are globalists which means no borders, no nations and virtually everything the same - easier to control from one place (OWG), or so they think. This is actual the politics of the 21st Century which the Russians and Chinese aren't going for. Expect trouble because it's coming.


Anonymous said...

"You've had my opinion of Blair several times Raedwald. It was 'Third Way' politics: the immigrants were the change agents (pluralism) and the wars were decapititions (new order)."

And its not a new plan - the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan is almost 100 years in the execution...

Budgie said...

When I criticised Blair to Labour supporters, back when he was in power, they defended him to the hilt. Yet now ..... now Labour call him a Tory. There are none so blind as those that will not see.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said @ 15:49

'And its not a new plan - the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan is almost 100 years in the execution'

Indeed, and Cancellor Merkel was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize in 2010.

So who was he and what did he do:

'Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan , making them supporters and collaborators for the “project of European integration”.

In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

The essence of the Kalegri Plan

In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution].'

That's where they're taking us and if you disagree they'll make life very difficult for you.


James Higham said...

Surely Blair should now be tried?

Dioclese said...

An excellent blog. Can't imagine how I've not found you earlier. I shall pop in regularly and add you to my blog list

Anonymous said...

Ms. Sterculian Rhetoric knows September 15, 1940 is not the publication date of the Daily Mail article, it is the "Battle of Britain Day".
As you might have already deduced, she enjoys irony.

The Tutor

mikebravo said...

Naughty, Naughty, Tutor!!

Anonymous said...

It is, an assumption too far, a mistake in concluding that, we actually care enough to read those abstruse meanderings.

G. Tingey said...

Anthony Eden?
Everything he touched turned to shit.

Anonymous / Steve

I call you out as a racist liar
Fucking grow up