Saturday, 27 February 2016

Vienna wakes up to Islamist indoctination in Kindergarten

A bit later than the rest of Europe, the city authorities in Vienna are waking up to the prevalent extent of hard-line Salafist Islamist indoctrination in the city's Muslim Kindergarten. In a 178-page report, by Prof. Ednan Aslan, documents how semi-literate Muslim women with a very poor command of German teach the supremacy of the Sharia over Austrian law in these schools, and also

- Children were intimidated with a punitive Muslim 'God' and made to learn Koran verses by rote
- Taught that polygamy is inevitable and necessary
- Told that Christian Europe will cease to exist in a few years

Prof Aslan found the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood pervasive in Muslim kindergarten, and accused the socialist city authorities of abject failure in continuing to deliberately ignore the evidence.

The new report follows a scandal last year implicating the Salafist Islamists in "Serious fraud, forgery of financial documents, Fördermittel- abuse, blackmail and extortion" and serious questions over the peculation of €1.8m in city funds. 

In a chilling video of German Islamist Pierre Vogel visiting a Vienna kindergarten, he praises the ability of 3-year-olds to learn the koran by rote; the video shows a room bereft of any children's drawings of human figures, an inhuman and unnatural restriction probably produced through fear and threat of punishment, but filled with images of Salafist and Islamist supremacy (below).


Barnacle Bill said...

"Give me the child, and I will mould the man."

Probably too late for the UK to prevent this coming true of all those who are being taught in the Muslim nurseries and primary schools hidden away here.

Jeff Wood said...

You are correct, Bill. It is probably too late.

Which is why they all need to be sent home. It is that, or shooting them.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Oh those Muslims. They're such characters. Innit? Still, they engage in a bit of Fördermittel on occasion - it's got an umlaut! Things with umlauts are cool. And they peculate! What's not to love about that? They're just like us!


I left my other, serious comment, HERE. I wouldn't bother going to read it - it's mucho boring.

Budgie said...

Raedwald, The problem with lslam in comparison with other religions (Mormons, Sikhs, Plymouth Brethren, Orthodox, etc) is its animus for active takeover rather than mere proselytising.

An open, tolerant, secular society such as ours is compatible with preachers but not conquerors. Whilst we may be glad that most Mus|ims appear peaceable, the apparent fruits of lslam still are conquest by war, conquest by migration, murder, slavery, torture, rape, destruction and propaganda, in modern times as well as the past.

Brushing the problems under the carpet will actually make the inevitable confrontation worse.

Malcolm Stevas said...

Thanks for the latest Austrian update: you're in the front line, as it were, passing recce details back to base...
On a different note, can't you get rid of this idiot "Sterculian" pest, whose contributions are an irritating waste of space? His/her strange verbal effluent reminds me of a similar pest who pollutes The Spectator lists and I wouldn't be surprised if they were one and the same.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Malcolm Stevas @ 27 February 2016 at 14:22,

An idiot?
Idiots - those who would score 0 to 50 on a standardized IQ test - cannot be taught to read and write. I do feel I have most demonstrably demonstrated my ability to at least write.
Conversely, Imbeciles - those who would score 50 to 70 on a standardized IQ test - can be taught to read and write, but just barely. At the very least, I must be considered a high-functioning Imbecile, if not actually a border-line Moron - those who would score 70 to 90 on a standardized IQ test.


You know, you don't have to read my pixellations. They are not initially addressed to you. I am conversing with the Blog Administrator. Why do you feel you must interfere? Why do you feel you must comment?

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Apologies Mr. Rædwald, but I was unaware you mess about in boats. Had I known, I might have asked permission to come aboard. Nyuck, nyuck. The Tutor also messes about in boats. I, on the other hand, was press-ganged into service as a galley slave and an instrument to dampen the violent swing of the main boom during The Tutor’s numerous unplanned jibes. The Tutor has just ‘upgraded’ from an Alberg 30 to a centre-cockpit Whitby 42. Although the 42 had its laying of the keel within a few years of my birth, it has been a well looked after new hole in the water into which The Tutor now throws his money.

I mean no harm.
I mean to be clever - maybe even funny to some folks.
I interact with the locals only when attacked. And a close analysis of my comments over the last few days will attest to that.

Budgie said...

Malcolm Stevas, I do agree with you that the Sterculian idiot is a pointless waste of space, not least because he spends so much time writing about himself, or rather his low rent avatar.

Raedwald said...

Sorry folks - as irritating as it may be, I really can't exclude our new commenter and retain any pretence at being libertarian. We do not censor anyone unless what they write is illegal or so grossly offensive that mankind itself rebels against it.

It may help those offended if you regard SR as mentally ill and view his / her posts as a genuine attempt to re-connect with we tedious and limited folk - any encouragement for them to drop the defensive shields of the obscure prose and interact normally would probably pay dividends and we may gain an intelligent and valuable friend.

Or something. Where's Tingey when you need him?

Anonymous said...

Maybe it is Tingey?

Anonymous said...

Raedwald said:

'Or something..'



Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Budgie @ 27 February 2016 at 15:55

Low rent avatar? I'll have you know, that 'Bat Girl' Gravatar is a facsimile of a painting by Ray Caesar! A damn sight better than the bollocks from those Britfucks Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin.

I am a girl, silly. NOT a Western-Culture-indoctrinated Girl either. Perhaps that is why y'all are having so much trouble believing I am female. I sure don't fights like no girl you done ever met. Innit?
And as for your appending of the 'Idiot' diagnosis upon me, I doubt you, or Mr. Stevas before you, have the academic standing required to make such a diagnosis. Please see my response to him and research the three terms: Idiot, Imbecile and Moron in the newly released DSM-5. Great bedtime reading!

Anonymous said...

Radders, I, quite understand, however my take is thus.

I avoid social meejah as in; twatter, tumbelweed and faceberk precisely because of mindfunks like the present pest.

If it doesn't piss off, then, very probably I shall, there is no added value in its mush of verbose, vacant wittering.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Mr. Rædwald @ 27 February 2016 at 17:33

"......It may help those offended if you regard SR as mentally ill....."

You silver-tongued devil, I bet you say that to all the girls. As the great Sage Lily Tomlin has informed us. "Reality is the leading cause of stress among those in touch with it." My working life is rife with nasty reality, I avoid it when on holiday.

What of those who are not offended, but possibly even amused - especially by how effectively, and with such panache, I dispatch those foolish enough to go once more unto the breach with me. I close the wall up with their English dead. May those who might appreciate my word salads regard me as mentally ill as well? Possessing a faint whiff(1) of insanity makes me look quite the tortured poet in the garret struggling against the pong of reality for my glorious art. Yes?
And Budgie? If you are reading this, and I am sure you are because down deep you want terribly in my knickers, the DSM-5 will help you to envision me insane.

" drop the defensive shields of the obscure prose and interact normally......"

It's my shtick! I never miss an opportunity for a prolix circumlocution if I can help it.
Day after day and post after post, how do you and your readership maintain such levels of outrage and indignation without suffering a concatenation of ever increasingly severe TIA events? It's okay to laugh now and again, Innit? That's my job.

".....we may gain an intelligent and valuable friend......"

I know you are taking a great chance with that statement, and I thank you, but as I know you are quite aware, I write my dross for the benefit of a very small minority of well educated and very intelligent folks. For the rest of the 'readership', I am as writing in Greek and the poor dolts do not understand. And what these folks do not understand, they fear. And what they fear, they attack.

Is this Tingey person bright? Or just another Epsilon Male with neither bark nor bite?

(1) Or foetid stench, if you prefer.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Anonymous @ 27 February 2016 at 22:12

".....If it doesn't piss off, then, very probably I shall, there is no added value in its mush of verbose, vacant wittering......"

If by 'it' you mean me? Ouch, that hurts.

I am sorry, but I cannot help but find that declarative to be 'very probably' funny.

As an Anonycunt, how will we ever know if you follow through with your threat and piss off? Perhaps you are the only "Anonymous" who uses the diminutive "Radders" in your conversations with Mr. Rædwald and when we cease to see Radders, we'll know you've gone?
"Vacant wittering"? All mimsy were the borogoves, Innit?
What they don't understand, they fear.

Thud said...

A bit of a distraction but quite funny so why ban,it will probably get bored anyway.

Anonymous said...

Quote from 'it':

Oh those Muslims. They're such characters. Innit?

Isis, burn people alive just for fun and throw gays off buildings for entertainment - such characters innit?

Warped and or brain dead or, both?

Anonymous said...

I clicked thinking that among 17 comments there might be a discussion in full flow only to find almost the entire thread commandeered by the witterings of SR which are neither intelligible nor amusing.

I've wondered before, when seeing SR's comments on other blogs, if s/he is mentally ill. If so, s/he has my pity (but I still wish s/he would piss off).


Anonymous said...

Sterculian Rhetoric:

"I'd say woman under thirty. A preposterous self confidence only alumni of North East Ivy leaguer's or alien Oxbridge provenance would possess. Perhaps of Caribbean extraction (and maybe lived over here a tad). Never been near a working ward or a grindstone come to that but probably knows someone close who did.

Narcissistic, endless propensity for self love, self promotion - probably an only child and always with the Socialistas conscience, so twee but knows not of hard graft, so daddy's money will sort all those blues out.

Nothing better to do, idle hands and with a big gob, wind up is her secret thrill."

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Such vehemence
Such hatred

Y'all remind me of those ISIS folks with their astronomical levels of hatred and intolerance.
Frankly, how do I tell the difference?
I reckon it is only a matter of time, before one of you highly enlightened and liberal folks refers to me, out of exasperation, as a Chink


Budgie said...

Raedwald, I said that the "Sterculian idiot is a pointless waste of space" not that he should be banned.

My eyes slide over what he has written, but what little I've picked up is predominantly about himself, and adds nothing to the debate. The flow appears to be both narcissistic and destructive, so engaging with any of it is a waste of time.

Your point about being libertarian (liberal?) is that when something comes along that destroys what has been built, retaining one's faith in liberalism becomes rather meaningless. That can happen to something small like a blog invaded by a troll, or something big like our culture invaded by lslam.

I am not saying I like any of this: I don't. It's rather sad in a way.

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Budgie @ 28 February 2016 at 16:15

".........My eyes slide over what he has written, but what little I've picked up is predominantly about himself, and adds nothing to the debate........"

If you admittedly 'pick up' very little of my pixellations, how do you know I am adding nowt to the debate?
Oh, and I'm a girl, silly.

".......Your point about being libertarian (liberal?)........"

Sheesh mate, do some research. Educate yourself. Libertarian and liberal, though not mutually exclusive, are not the same.

Poisonedchalice said...

Sterculia - tropical chestnut tree. There is no "Sterculian" as that noun does not exist. The plural of Sterculia is Steculias.

Innit :)

Coney Island

Sterculian Rhetoric said...

Dearest Poisonedchalice @ 29 February 2016 at 13:08

Sterculius - Roman God of Fertilizer.

You are correct, "Sterculian" as a noun does not exist. "Sterculian" as an adjective, modifying the noun "Rhetoric", does.