Cookie Notice

However, this blog is a US service and this site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and analyze traffic. Your IP address and user-agent are shared with Google along with performance and security metrics to ensure quality of service, generate usage statistics, and to detect and address abuse.

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

There are none so blind as New Labour

One of the main reasons I took up blogging was as an outlet for the frustration that listening to 'Today' on R4 causes. Morning after morning I'd wake up to the news of some fatuous utterance by one of the Lords of the New Labour Universe. I was reminded of this again this morning.

Last night I heard some horribly well meaning policy maker advocating the teaching of parenting skills by the state. This was in reaction to a threat by the state to take into its care a fat child whose mother had not restricted its feeding. The mother, interviewed on television, was like a rabbit caught in the headlights; not evil or negligent, just helpless. She kept repeating 'He wouldn't eat anything else' and 'I had to let him eat'. She sat alone in her social housing, surrounded by reporters, unwittingly thrown into the spotlight of vulgar condemnation and damned for her stupidity. A glimpse into a lonely, dispiriting and pointlessly sad life.

A couple of weeks ago the Education Secretary proposed that the state should teach children to cook.

What else should the state start teaching? Table manners? Shoe-lace tying? How to brush your teeth? Getting up in the morning?

It is the most damning indictment of the grasp of big government on the souls of the nation that the automated, pat, glib and instant response to any social failing today is to blame the state for inadequate or insufficient intervention in people's lives.

Why isn't anyone saying the bloody obvious? It's not the state, it's the family. The relationship between the size and reach of the state and the importance of families and communities has been commented on, in particular by the late Conservative sociologist Robert Nisbet. When the power of one is big, the other is generally small. One can't have authority and influence centred in families and communities AND in big government.

So on the one hand we have the New Labour puppets affirming that single parent, isolated, individual 'families' that have a relationship only with the agents of the state are fine and dandy. On the other we have David Cameron who has effectively presented the case for the family. And I hope, I really hope in my heart, also knows the unspoken concomitant condition - that the state must be shrunk.

New Labour are obtuse enough to see this as an old-fashioned moralistic or religious argument; they simply will not see that it is their terribly well meaning but horribly destructive vision of the role of the state as parent, grandparent, extended family and community that is responsible for this awful national disintegration.

That mumping rogue Rousseau would have been proud of Alan Johnson.


Anonymous said...

Slightly tangential to your blog - holding up the white working class to being constantly pilloried, mocked and humiliated as this story has done once more, is the breeding ground of bottom feeders like the BNP. We cannot, as a nation, treat the poor and the less able in this way, they are getting angry, in local electiobs recently you are constantly seeing the BNP with 10 - 15% of the votes. Disturbing.

Raedwald said...

Tend to agree. They're the only group it's still OK for the trendy chattering classes to mock. By introducing 'right to buy' legislation the Conservatives gave many of them the opportunity to break-out, but all nuLab have done is lock them ever more tightly in place - social mobility has slumped since 1997. And they're angry.