Cookie Notice

WE LOVE THE NATIONS OF EUROPE
However, this blog is a US service and this site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and analyze traffic. Your IP address and user-agent are shared with Google along with performance and security metrics to ensure quality of service, generate usage statistics, and to detect and address abuse.

Friday, 12 February 2010

Brown's shameless gerrymandering

If you've got 80p in Gateshead, you've got the same spending power as someone in London who's got £1. Why, then, should we have a national minimum wage?

Brown's proposals to raise the NMW to £6 an hour across the country benefits those in Wales and the NE and NW, Labour's traditional strongholds, but does little to help businesses in those regions. If £6/hr were a fair rate in London, the government's own figures suggest that £4.80/hr is the right rate for the NW.

Indeed, the research was commissioned by Brown himself - when he argued that national pay grades in the NHS and public services were inappropriate, that a £40k salary goes a lot further in Gateshead than Guildford, and pledged to introduce regional differentials that recognised differences in the cost of living.

Except of course when Labour needs to buy votes.

3 comments:

Mrs R said...

Well said - linked

Mark Wadsworth said...

Here via Mrs R.

Of course minimum wages are a shit idea, whether national, local, job specific, whatever, as is national pay bargaining.

Far better to reduce income-based benefit withdrawal - if you're on NMW and claiming tax credits and Housing Benefit, you only keep about 30 pence an hour of that £6.

Krauser said...

The only people in Gateshead with jobs are the people employed by the government to administrate the people without jobs.