Saturday, 13 March 2010
They still don't get it. Insulated in their fantasy Palace from the reality of public anger, they will pretend that Uddin is 'noble' rather than the chiselling, crooked, ignoble guttershite she is.
The whole deeply corrupt business of life peerages should now be put under the microscope. Allowing the sleazy and corrupt political class to nominate their loathsomly bent mates for honours was never going to produce anything but dishonour. It's time we cleared out this filth.
Friday, 12 March 2010
Dr Hedda Bumstorf said "It's possible this was a ritual beheading, with the victims believing they were being sent to a land of everlasting unquestioned expenses". However, evidence on the bones suggests that most were beheaded unwillingly. "They were running around like chickens, being chased by blokes with axes. It's amazing that even when their heads were hacked off they maintained their grip on the expenses forms."
An expert from the Museum of London added "Bone callouses on the pelvic bones suggests they spent much of their lives in an occupation that involved sitting; many were morbidly obese, and so less able to escape the axemen". Writing experts were still trying to decipher characters on the expenses forms. "We're really not sure about our translation" one said "We've translated one as 'duck island' which doesn't make sense, and another says 'bathplug' we think."
Thursday, 11 March 2010
Troughing Labour scum Alan and Ann Keen, who robbed the taxpayer of £175,000 for their up-market apartment, and who have claimed £1.7m - yes, £1.7m - between them in expenses over seven years, were let off wit a mild wrist-slap by the Labour-dominated Standards and Privileges Committee today, a fine of £1,500.
It seems the bent bastards in this Rotten Parliament have yet to learn their lesson; the days are gone when guttershite crooks like the Keens and their corrupt Labour cabal can dung-over their graft and venality.
Fish rots from the head, and it is Brown's thuggish culture of jobbery, fraud, graft and dishonesty that encourages talentless Labour dags like the Keens to thrust their snouts in the swill and drink deep. Nothing has changed.
If the Keens were pelted with filth in the streets and the expensive clothes torn from their backs it would be no less than they deserve. They are leeches, parasites on the public purse, and no better than crackheads robbing the church poorbox. May their souls rot in Hell.
Harman later compounded her stupidity by stating openly "It's clear the troughing bastards are guilty, but for the Party's sake we have to pretend otherwise".
See Matthew Parris in the Times this morning.
So when Brown's monstrous government warns our troops in the field that they may be denied the vote in the coming elections because Bob Jobsworth's unfit-for-pupose shiny-arses can't fly their ballot papers out to Afghanistan on time, you smell the stench of political corruption and gerrymandering.
If flying Brown's carcass to Afghanistan for another photo-op during the election campaign displaces a flight-load of ballot papers, you can be sure the lads won't be best pleased. You don't have to ask which one they'd rather have, and which one is more use for their morale.
'Character is not about telling people what they want to hear but about telling them what they need to know' said Brown, as he ignores every economic reality to pretend that 'Spend Spend Spend!' is a grown-up fiscal policy, just because it is what voters want to hear.
'It is about having the courage to set out your mission and the courage to take the tough decisions and stick to them without being blown off- course, even when the going is difficult.' said Brown, the man whose own courage is so conspicuously lacking that he's not dared to face a single contested election in his entire political career, a bottler, an arse-crawler, a lily-livered party hack.
At every opportunity, the most risible lies drip from Brown's pendulous lips whilst Dave stands open-mouthed, paralysed by the audacity of his mendacity.
As Benedict Brogan has it in the Telegraph this morning;
Part of their problem is their own disbelief: they cannot quite believe that Mr Brown is getting away with it. They are overwhelmed by the sheer gall of a Prime Minister who could say, in a speech yesterday, "with me, what you see is what you get", when the records show the precise opposite is true. They have read Andrew Rawnsley's forensic exposition of the hatreds and deceptions that mark the Prime Minister's career and cannot fathom why the rest of us cannot see the serial dishonesty, the political opportunism, the dangerous indecisiveness, the directionless moral compass, let alone his serial policy failures. How, they wonder, can we possibly be contemplating giving this guy another five years?How indeed.
Dave had better discover the brass balls to counter this loathsome man, or the nation, and his party, will cast him into obloquy.
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
You'd think the Charity Commission, under the leadership of Labour party member Suzi Leather, would put a stop to this corrupt and sleazy con-trick on the public .... Oh, I see.
'No Smoking Day' (Registered Charity number 1006714) gets around half its £1m income directly from government in the form of grants, or through other Fake Charities funded by government. The rest comes from flogging 'No Smoking Day' merchandise to, er, health authorities, GPs' surgeries and other public sector organisations.
There is no evidence hat there is ANY genuine public support for 'No Smoking Day' - it's wholly a contrived government con, disguised as a charity.
So take joy today in your tobacco.
Tuesday, 9 March 2010
In London, completions have fallen around 11% from 22,750 new dwellings completed in 2007 to 20,230 in 2009, an annual drop of 2,520 dwellings. However, there are signs that the market is sorting itself out; there was a big standstill in the last quarter of 2008 on new starts as sites were frozen, but these are now being completed, and completions in the last quarter of 2009 were back to 2007 levels.
So how much of that 11% drop will Gordon's 'boost' reverse? London's share of Gordon's pot comes to 141 dwellings - that's, er, a boost of 0.62%. If all 141 are built in the same year. I expect the market will sort the other 10.38%.
There was a time when a government policy that increased home completions by less than 1% would have been a matter of shame for ministers - not in Brown's government, it seems.
Aircraft for all! Let's have a convoluted and corrupt procurement process that takes three years, then order say a dozen new Fokker 30s at €15m each, all painted up in EU livery.
The more the buggers trough, the sooner the sound of the tumbrels will be heard in Grand Place.
The answer to 'weapon dogs' isn't yet more unworkable legislation from the central State, it's for councils and social landlords to do their job.
If you really want a new law, then bring one in that jails the Chief Executive of a council or housing association for thirty days if a weapon-dog from one of their properties attacks someone. I guarantee that within weeks the problem will have all but disappeared.
Monday, 8 March 2010
How can anyone with an ounce of responsibility vote for this cowardly, twisted, bloody-handed, treasonous piece of ordure?
We do not need to call in the psychiatrists. Hitherto, Gordon Brown's behaviour has seemed incomprehensible, but the answer is now clear. The indecisiveness, the self-pity, the chronic nervous strain, the constant ill-temper, the barely-suppressed violence: all is explained, on the assumption that the Prime Minister still has the residue of a conscience, and that his personality is crumbling under the stress of telling all those lies. This does not mean that he should be forgiven. Lying to Parliament used to be regarded as just about the gravest offence that a politician could commit. But there is a worse one: lying to or about the armed forces.As a result of Mr Brown's malfeasance – abetted by Mr Blair's cowardice – men have died who should have lived: men have been crippled who could have escaped with minor injuries.
Sunday, 7 March 2010
Polly Toynbee, Harriet Harman and all the trendy upper-class harridans of the left who have so betrayed and destroyed the British working class are the real whores of Babylon, evil and corrupt, their rotten ageing flesh carrying the grave-stink beneath expensive scents and unguents. Philip Blond, not so much a 'Red Conservative' as an Old Tory - saw this back in 2007;
"Crime and violence are not necessarily caused by economic inequality. Before the Second World War, working-class communities, though far poorer than today, lived lives largely free of violence and crime.
So what has happened in the last 50 years that has so destroyed our inner cities and council estates? In short, it is the annihilation of working-class families and their culture by the liberal middle class. The welfare state and the progressive attitudes of the 1960s unpicked the stitching that held the British working class together during two World Wars and the great depression of the 1930s.Of course, nobody thinks we should abandon universal health care and social provision. But the centralised and imposed system of the welfare state was a creation of the middle-class that ultimately destroyed the self-help culture of the British poor.
All the organisations (churches, friendly societies, co-operatives) that the working class had created to help each other were made pointless overnight. Instead of working with your neighbours to solve a local problem, you wait for government to fix it.
The working classes originally wanted a more mutual welfare state where entitlement was based on what they put in; instead the middle classes, irritated by the ability of the poor to organise themselves, determined their needs for them - creating a depressing dependency culture in our inner cities.
The poor might have survived this if middle-class culture had not invented progressive values. In the 1960s, the middle classes abdicated a wider social responsibility and decided that the culture of their parents was paternal and repressive. They bought the idea that notions of service and responsibility were an unjust imposition and embraced the pursuit of wealth, drugs and sexual liberation as self-evident positives, in the process repudiating any idea of a common national vision.
While toxic to civilised middle-class life, such values were lethal to the working class. In the absence of a culture that was genuinely their own, the children of the poor embraced this middle-class decadence. They gradually abandoned each other and instead embraced glamour, greed and sexual promiscuity as if they were a form of liberation."
Evil Evil Evil.
The problem with this new type of extended family, (Geoff) Dench says, is that it is not self-sustaining but tends to be parasitic on conventional families in the rest of society. In fact, it appears to lead inexorably to the nightmare of an unproductive dependent underclass.The costs, of course, aren't just the costs of housing and benefits for the single mums and their bastards, but grossly higher lifetime costs to remediate the impacts of children growing up without their biological fathers - bastards take a disproportionately high share of criminal justice costs, health care costs, education costs, social welfare, police and probation and housing costs. And the rest of us are paying for a 'lifestyle choice' that we don't endorse.
The economist Professor Bob Rowthorn commented with some feeling last week that man-free women are very mistaken to imagine they don’t need men. The truth is they desperately need men in the form of all those male taxpayers (to say nothing of female taxpayers) who are forced to pay for a way of life that they don’t approve of and that they know to be socially disastrous. It is hugely unfair to make responsible people who are struggling to support their own families struggle harder still to support women who won’t work.
This may be Labour's idea of 'fairness' but it isn't mine. I've said before, anyone can make whatever 'lifestyle choice' they like, so long as they pay for it themselves. They can kill themselves with cocaine, overdose on rent boys, pickle themselves in Bollinger and bear bastards enough to staff a laundry - but don't ask me to live a frugal, industrious and responsible life to pay for it. Because I've had enough.