There are no good Islamists (using the former PM's definition of Islamism). Non-Islamist Moslems can live amongst us in peace so long as their true allegiance is to our realm and not to their faith. And Moslems cannot just walk by and pretend that they and their faith are not the root of the problem. Unless Moslems here are now active in helping destroy Islamism in Britain, they are also part of the problem.
NB If anyone has evidence that this picture is a fake, I'll happily remove it. I've carried out an image-match search and it doesn't appear on the internet before yesterday early evening. Light and weather conditions are right, for yesterday, as is clothing. Could be a photoshop - please alert me if someone has done a pixel analysis.
24 comments:
Your picture Radders says it all, the woman with her head covered just walking by the poor person on the deck. They, ALL Muslims, just hate us and should never be trusted.
At Barnacle Towers the flags are at half mast in respect for those murdered yesterday.
Unfortunately, we have no way of removing Muslims who live here legitimately and who will not (as Mark Rutte put it) "be normal."
We can't even get rid of the ones living here illegitimally.
There isn't a peaceful, civilised Muslim country anywhere in the world. And as their numbers and influence grow here, this country will also no longer be a peaceful, civilised country - due to their presence.
I wonder...
Most politicians are those elitists and illiberal that foist there ill-informed opinions and laws upon the rest of us, including the doctrine that "immigration is good for us" and "Islam is a peaceful religion". And they do this in the isolated knowledge that their decisions will never become a harm to themselves.
Well now it's happened; their cosy cosseted club has been visited by Islamist violence.
I wonder if this will have an influence on future political outcomes?
'moderate izlam' is an oxymoron put about by morons who refuse to see if for what it is, a malignant political creed so designed to cow, kill and subjugate - with this pestilential doctrine there is no middle way.
In a survey drawn not so long after 7/7 approx 40% of muslims living in Britain advocated righteous Jihad and the rest pay lip service - like they even had a choice............but the below quote tells you the thinking going on behind the mask:
Quote,
One of the speakers that night was young firebrand calling himself Zahir.
Respected Midlands-based journalist Amardeep Bassey was allowed into the meeting. He said Zahir’s real name was in fact Umran Javed.
Javed, from Derby, was jailed for six years in 2007 after he called for American and Danish people to be murdered at a protest in London against cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed.
No one who heard him speak that night all those years ago would have been surprised at such a turn of events.
‘I was born in this country,’ he said. ‘I went to nursery, infant, and secondary school, college and then university in this country. But am I British? Absolutely not.
‘I am a Muslim first and foremost. We will never be accepted by the Kufr [‘unbeliever’] so we should never pander to their whims or support their actions like some so-called Muslims have been doing.
‘If they continue to do so, it is our duty to persuade them not to. But if they do not listen, they are Kufr too and so it is our duty to fight and even kill them.’ /quote.
read it and weep - here Daily MAIL LINK
Islamism is mainstream! and Wahhabist filth is taught in 99% of UK 'community centres'.
DeeDee is chillingly correct in that, this cannot end well and what is even more galling is that, the UK authorities take the side, change the rules, use 'kid gloves' on the "invaders". Infiltrated we have been and the Gulf states and their masters in Riyadh their money and influence pervades and across all UK university campuses.
Their fellow adherents, who have so thoroughly permeated all UK institutions and in all local and national political spheres - they only seek one goal - Ummah, did I say 'invaders' yes: for that is what they are.
No doubt TPTB will trot out the line that this outrage "has nothing to do with Islam", even the Met issued a statement to say that it was down to "international terrorism" FFS! Those right on, liberal lefties, social justice warriors and all the rest of the visually challenged in London will light their candles, come out with a suitable hashtag, and make hearts out of their hands. Bloody idiots. They have to do this you see, because to accept as most of the rest of the UK does that it has everything to do with Islam to to acknowledge that diversity and multiculturism is dead and that they were wrong.
One should read Katie Hopkins in the DM. She's says she's not angry, but I think that truthfully she's absolutely effing incandescent with fury because it was all soooooo predictable.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4340290/Truth-t-like-says-KATIE-HOPKINS.html
One day the International Court of Justice will haul our western politicians before it and demand to know why they were complicit in the genocide of the western people..
..except there will be no International Court of Justice by then.
When I first saw this picture of the woman walking past, indifferent to the scenes around her, holding a phone, I wondered if she was recording the mayhem for some reason.
Radders. I do not have any proof, but...... I am certain(?) that the photo is either fake or not from yesterdays atrocities.
Others, better than I have questioned it.
The suspicions are that it is either a composite or the incident depicted is 'merely' someone who has (say) being taken unwell & is being tended to in the normal way.
If the above conjecture is valid, then the young woman (being vilified...) is either not even there or is just not indulging in the usual practice of 'rubber necking'.
Bob - thanks. I'll do some research. If it's fake I'll remove it.
I have heard that it is a photoshopped image, albeit a good one.
Needless to say this will change NOTHING. The usual apologists will turn out by the hundreds and the craven cowards of Westminster, safe behind their barricades, will issue excuses on behalf of the Islamic Community.
Further iniquities will be heaped upon the innocent public in the form of increased surveillance, more intimate searches and restricted access - all the while ignoring the practicalities, indeed the NECESSITIES, of positive profiling.
Those that object or voice even a modicum of truth will feel the full force of .gov falling upon them for daring to point out the failings of our leadership and the attacks on blogs such as this will be hardened.
I despair at the level to which society must inevitably sink before the fightback is allowed to begin - with or without the consent of our leadership. For it is precisely the LACK of leadership that is bringing down our society. We worried about foreign Government (the EU) being the cause of our demise when we should have been looking inwardly to the fifth column that Farage so concisely identified but the media, as usual, failed to target.
When will the straw break the back? You can almost feel the rise of resentment towards the liberal left and socialism in general and the breaking of the back of the traitorous media will be all it takes for the avalanche to begin.
Will those people have died in vain? Sadly they will become yet more statistics to be ignored.
You are utterly wrong with your attachment to the cuck Camorons "Islamist" bollocks.
Their book tells them they are the master cult and anyone not in their cult is scum who can be robbed, raped, enslaved or killed by the cultists at will.
Alright "ordinary" RoP'ers might just want to get on with their lives. Ordinary Germans of Hitler's Germany probably weren't filled with the desire to set Europe ablaze. But they will do what their "leaders" tell them to. That is what makes them ordinary.
No more must be allowed in. Their marriages must be recognised and bigamy laws applied full force against them No more 4 women in tow. Their state subsidised breeding program must end. They must lose the vote to stop power blocks forming. And a native armed militia must be formed to ensure that we have lots of manpower to deal with any national emergency.
Failures ? I don't see it that way at all.
They are small bit-part players in the long game. They keep us busy, fumbling for the right emoticon, scared to speak out coz it's not all muslims bruv, the moderate ones they're OK yeah.
The most conservative estimates suggest that indigenous Britons will be in a minority within a couple of lifetimes. It is over.
Aesop's fable, The farmer and the Viper suggests we knew the answer long ago.
Going to fix this for you.
"Non-Islamist Moslems can live amongst us in peace "
Non Moslem Arabs or Asians can live amongst us in peace ..."
Don't forget Rochdale, Oxford and the myriad other instances that you can be sure the police have concealed.
And the Moslem who travelled all the way to Glasgow to kill a guy, because he got on with Christians.
These people are not fit for a civilised society.
Who'd have thought that that civilised gentleman Enoch Powell was seer?
ITV's website lists eleven different nationalities among the victims.
"coz it's not all muslims bruv,"
Ha! Remember the stabby RoP guy at Leytonstow Underground a year or so ago?
The BBC played prominently the "You ain't no Moslem bruv .. " clip, that some bystander shouted as the victim(s) were bleeding to death.
The BBC is as much our enemy as the terrorists.
"you ain't no moslem bruv"
"Oh yes I am" he inwardly shrieked and we it knew too.
Slightly OT but a month or so ago I saw somewhere that May wanted Cameron as SecretaryGen for Nato Stoltenberg, appointed on a corrupt deal with Norway, is due to retire. Last evening a tweet from Cameron on the London incident was flashed on BBC2. Much later on radio 4 Stoltenberg came on with platitudes about the incident. Its the bookmakers for me! Libyan war criminal/ failed PM for a war posting. Makes me sick to my stomach.
Raedwald said:
'Non-Islamist Moslems can live amongst us in peace so long as their true allegiance is to our realm and not to their faith.'
Oh dear, they don't do 'realms' Raedwald. The closest aproximation would be 'caliphate' - with no Queens in either sense of that word.
Methinks an appreciation of the text is required:
Quran (4:95)
"Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward "
This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).
Quran (2:216)
"Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
and so on..
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call on Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by historical context contained in the surrounding text (although many Muslims choose to think of them that way). They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.
The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God. Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Their apologists cater to these preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.
Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own martial legacy, along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran, have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.
Steve
Image resusitation already is in full flow, Khalid Masood was from "Kent" - not and perish the thought of it from London - you do understand.
He, Masood was a "keen gardener",
a "late convert"
of course he was a "lone wolf attacker"
and not "affiliated to Islamic State of Iraq and Sham".
Happy homelife, a peaceful man and incumbent MP, the old lady theresa of Westminster says, "this is nothing to do with the RoP."
And so it goes thus we all are to go back to the bread and public PC 'values' circus of indoctination propaganda, via eastenders then?
Even if the picture is likely photoshopped the message is still valid.
"....Khalid Masood was from "Kent"..." rather as I'm Paddy O'Brien from Syria.
Jay
should have said reengineer, resuscitate, not quite.
The Islamic presence in Europe is foreign in every way - racial, cultural and religious. It needs be turned back.
It has come about due to a serious lack of education, and ignorance of Islam by the political elite.
Lets look at what we are up against. With Islam there will be no compromise. Not because of us, but Islam will not accept a compromise, unless they are losing. Every canonical text of Islam forbids an abiding peace with the Infidel. A compromise treaty (Hudna), can hold for a maximum ten years, with the specific purpose for Muslims to re-organise and re-arm, and start the war again. This will not end until Islam is victorious, and Sharia is established throughout Christendom - the long term goal of Islam, or it is pushed back out of Europe, as it was at the Gates of Vienna in 1684.
These days Muslims don't even have to wage war. All they have to do is to sit tight on Benefits, and let demography do the rest. Once Muslims are more then 30% of the population, its sharia legally, implemented by parliament. Goodbye Western civilisation. Lost due the stupendous ignorance of our political elite. No parallel in history of such blind stupidity.
DP111
Post a Comment