In doing so he will join the biggest collection of crooked thieves, spivs, mendacious self-lovers, those who have enriched themselves at public expense and political failures in Europe - the House of Lords.
Not only is our honours system befouled and corrupted by the stench of political corruption, our second chamber is filled with the feculent rotting zombie-corpses of the political class, men and women so loathsome, so unemployable, so unendurable that they are barred forever from decent human society.
Politicians befoul and beshit our second chamber and our honours system. It's high time we sent in the bulldozers to clear the putrescent enobled political filth from this gilded place - the Rennards, the Kinnocks, the globalist dags, all those who would deny the democratic will of the British people. Barwell will only be joining the antidemocrats in the Lords who worked with him so diligently to destroy Brexit whilst the dismally inept May was nominally in office.
 |
| 'Lord' Rennard - google 'Rennard' and 'groping' for the story |
14 comments:
Not that it's ever likely to happen you understand but if I were offered a peerage I would be compelled to refuse it. I wouldn't want to be so contaminated by that House of chancers, spives, crooks, fraudsters, sexual deviants and more than a few traitors
He doesn't look any nicer in the flesh.
He was my MP, and I gave him short shrift when he came looking for my vote. At the time he told me that I should vote "blue" if I wanted to get Brexit. He told me that he knew Mrs. May very well, and I said that I knew her better and knew that she would not be delivering Brexit. I told him that the only reason that we were where we were was because of purple.
As it turned out it was the last time that I voted purple, and I am pleased to say that despite UKIP's terrible performance, the 12 year old rat faced self publicist was out.
Imagine my deep joy, when he turned up as May's bagman.
Oh don't start that crap again. A MAJORITY voted leave (those that were allowed to and could be bothered to and that's all that counts).
Fuck off with the 'quarter' shite.
Equally, just because they didn't specify 'no agreement' neither did they specify their MUST be one.
Your repetition is just so much bullshit.
FFS, cut this twat off Raed.
JPM(2) - as the bouncer said, your mate can come in, but not you.
JPM (1) - day off?
There is only one of me, Raedwald. My IP address - not that it proves anything - is singular, you will find.
I'm capable or writing in more than one spirit, you know?
It's a pity that some of your commenters are such wilting wet lettuces, that they can't take simple, numerical and constitutional facts though.
Talking of bouncers, Barwell tried to do no more than Dominic Cummings himself would have done, it seems.
Since the referendum, Mr Cummings has described Brexit as a “train wreck”, and said triggering Article Fifty too early was like “putting a gun in your mouth and pulling the trigger”. He also branded David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, “thick as mince and lazy as a toad”, and described the Tory European Research Group as “useful idiots for Remain”.
So what can his first point mean? Only that he, absolutely, wants a sensible deal with the European Union, surely?
@rapscallion
Unless around a thousand ordinary types, like you and me, could be persuaded to be non-hereditary Lords for a year with the promise that we would vote to end the House of Lords. We could then renounce our Lordships, or even keep them... because they wouldn't mean much.
Is there a need for a second house, I don't see it. If it must be though its members
should be wholly elected not perks for the clique. Having elections for the upper and lower houses staggered half way through the cycle would be a good thing too, keep people engaged.
There could be both voting and non-voting members of the HoL with the voting members selected by each political party and in numbers proportional to the number of votes cast for each party at each GE.
These voting members would also include those from parties who did not manage to gain an MP because of the FPTP system but never-the-less did receive sufficient votes to have at least one HoL representative.
Bring back the hereditary peers! Get rid of patronage as it muddies the waters of scrutiny and debate. What I like about the hereditary peers is the serendipity, some live in big houses while others live in bedsits. If the revising chamber becomes elected it will be a second chance saloon for those who desire power and its trappings. As Auberon Waugh used to say; "those who wish to be politicians should be barred from politics".
Being as there are only 10 comments I'll risk the wrath of R and post this.......
Q Mr. President, have you spoken with Boris Johnson yet?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Very good question.
Q And what did you have to say?
THE PRESIDENT: That’s the best question you’ve ever asked.
Q I asked it the other day, and you said, “no.”
THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know why your timing is good? Because I spoke to him about -- how long have you been here? Sixteen minutes. I spoke to him 17 minutes ago. I hung up the phone as you were coming in.
And he’s a good guy. He’s a friend of mine. I think we’re going to have a great relationship. And Boris is going to be a great Prime Minister. I predict he will be a great Prime Minister. He has what it takes. They needed him for a long time. UK needed him for a long time. And --
Q Would you -- would you invite him here?
THE PRESIDENT: -- let’s see what happens. Yeah, he’ll - he and I will spend a lot of -- we just spent a lot of time when I was with the Queen in one of the great, most beautiful couple of days that I’ve ever experienced. She’s a tremendous woman. Incredible woman. We get along very well.
So, Boris and I just spoke. I congratulated him. And he’s all set to go. He’s going to be -- I think he’ll do a great job.
We’re working already on a trade agreement. And I think it will be a very substantial trade agreement. You know, we can do with the UK -- we can do three to four times. We were actually impeded by their relationship with the European Union. We were very much impeded on trade. And I think we can do three to four, five times what we’re doing.
We don’t do the kind of trade we could do with what some people say is Great Britain, and some people remember a word you don’t hear too much is the word, "England," which is a piece of it.
But with the UK, we could do much, much more trade. And we expect to do that, okay?
Andy at 14:38
Totally agree!
M Davis
The Con Party will never abolish the House of Frauds. The Brexit Party would, given the opportunity.
Yep, needs a full steam clean scrub down. All sacked, herediatry reinstated if attendance adequate.
Post a Comment